Review



mouse anti human sod1  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Proteintech mouse anti human sod1
    Fig. 3 Nanoparticle behaviour in biological solutions. A Colloidal stability of GO, GOPEI, and GOPEI-mPEG were assessed in DIW, 0.9% NaCl, and RPMI + 10% FBS, 1 h after treatment. Nanoparticle aggregation was observed in all three biological solutions containing non- functionalized GO. B, C Gel-electrophoresis-based serum stability was carried out in GOPEI1x, GOPEI2x, and GOPEI3x. The susceptibility of siRNA to RNase degradation in serum was assessed for 48 h. Naked siSCR was used as a control. D Kinetic study of nanocarrier-siRNA serum stability was measured using mouse serum in siSCRFAM conjugated GOPEI, GOPEI-mPEG, and Lipo2000 relative to control naked siSCRFAM. The fluorescence of siSCRFAM was measured over a time of up to 8 h. E Kinetic study of nanoparticle behaviour was conducted in vitro using siSCRFAM complexed GO, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG. The degree of quenching induced by GOPEI upon binding siSCRFAM was measured by a Varioskan fluorescent plate reader. A 10 h time-course study of the live cell uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by recording their fluorescent emission. Samples containing only cells and RPMI media were used as negative controls. F Confocal laser scanning images showing the cellular uptake of GOPEI- siSCRFAM. Merged fluorescence images of cells treated with GOPEI- siSCRFAM with a magnified image of a single A2780 cell showing successful transfection of GOPEI as aggregations were compared with Lipo2000 as the positive control, and naked siSCRFAM was used as a negative control. G Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle: siRNA cellular uptake GOPEI-siRNA transfection efficiency was analyzed using flow cytometry. Two siSCRFAM concentrations of 60 nM and 90 nM complexed with Lipo2000 served as positive control. H Image showing intracellular graphene accumulation in cell pellets following three washing steps and centrifugation prior to protein isolation. I, J Time-course study showing <t>SOD1</t> mRNA and protein levels following SOD1 knockdown. K, L The effect of concentration dependent SOD1 knockdown on protein levels was determined by Western blot and mRNA expression levels were measured using RT-qPCR. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ns- not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001 as analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test.
    Mouse Anti Human Sod1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 401 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti human sod1/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 401 article reviews
    mouse anti human sod1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Targeting SOD1 via RNAi with PEGylated graphene oxide nanoparticles in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer."

    Article Title: Targeting SOD1 via RNAi with PEGylated graphene oxide nanoparticles in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

    Journal: Cancer gene therapy

    doi: 10.1038/s41417-023-00659-2

    Fig. 3 Nanoparticle behaviour in biological solutions. A Colloidal stability of GO, GOPEI, and GOPEI-mPEG were assessed in DIW, 0.9% NaCl, and RPMI + 10% FBS, 1 h after treatment. Nanoparticle aggregation was observed in all three biological solutions containing non- functionalized GO. B, C Gel-electrophoresis-based serum stability was carried out in GOPEI1x, GOPEI2x, and GOPEI3x. The susceptibility of siRNA to RNase degradation in serum was assessed for 48 h. Naked siSCR was used as a control. D Kinetic study of nanocarrier-siRNA serum stability was measured using mouse serum in siSCRFAM conjugated GOPEI, GOPEI-mPEG, and Lipo2000 relative to control naked siSCRFAM. The fluorescence of siSCRFAM was measured over a time of up to 8 h. E Kinetic study of nanoparticle behaviour was conducted in vitro using siSCRFAM complexed GO, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG. The degree of quenching induced by GOPEI upon binding siSCRFAM was measured by a Varioskan fluorescent plate reader. A 10 h time-course study of the live cell uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by recording their fluorescent emission. Samples containing only cells and RPMI media were used as negative controls. F Confocal laser scanning images showing the cellular uptake of GOPEI- siSCRFAM. Merged fluorescence images of cells treated with GOPEI- siSCRFAM with a magnified image of a single A2780 cell showing successful transfection of GOPEI as aggregations were compared with Lipo2000 as the positive control, and naked siSCRFAM was used as a negative control. G Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle: siRNA cellular uptake GOPEI-siRNA transfection efficiency was analyzed using flow cytometry. Two siSCRFAM concentrations of 60 nM and 90 nM complexed with Lipo2000 served as positive control. H Image showing intracellular graphene accumulation in cell pellets following three washing steps and centrifugation prior to protein isolation. I, J Time-course study showing SOD1 mRNA and protein levels following SOD1 knockdown. K, L The effect of concentration dependent SOD1 knockdown on protein levels was determined by Western blot and mRNA expression levels were measured using RT-qPCR. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ns- not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001 as analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 3 Nanoparticle behaviour in biological solutions. A Colloidal stability of GO, GOPEI, and GOPEI-mPEG were assessed in DIW, 0.9% NaCl, and RPMI + 10% FBS, 1 h after treatment. Nanoparticle aggregation was observed in all three biological solutions containing non- functionalized GO. B, C Gel-electrophoresis-based serum stability was carried out in GOPEI1x, GOPEI2x, and GOPEI3x. The susceptibility of siRNA to RNase degradation in serum was assessed for 48 h. Naked siSCR was used as a control. D Kinetic study of nanocarrier-siRNA serum stability was measured using mouse serum in siSCRFAM conjugated GOPEI, GOPEI-mPEG, and Lipo2000 relative to control naked siSCRFAM. The fluorescence of siSCRFAM was measured over a time of up to 8 h. E Kinetic study of nanoparticle behaviour was conducted in vitro using siSCRFAM complexed GO, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG. The degree of quenching induced by GOPEI upon binding siSCRFAM was measured by a Varioskan fluorescent plate reader. A 10 h time-course study of the live cell uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by recording their fluorescent emission. Samples containing only cells and RPMI media were used as negative controls. F Confocal laser scanning images showing the cellular uptake of GOPEI- siSCRFAM. Merged fluorescence images of cells treated with GOPEI- siSCRFAM with a magnified image of a single A2780 cell showing successful transfection of GOPEI as aggregations were compared with Lipo2000 as the positive control, and naked siSCRFAM was used as a negative control. G Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle: siRNA cellular uptake GOPEI-siRNA transfection efficiency was analyzed using flow cytometry. Two siSCRFAM concentrations of 60 nM and 90 nM complexed with Lipo2000 served as positive control. H Image showing intracellular graphene accumulation in cell pellets following three washing steps and centrifugation prior to protein isolation. I, J Time-course study showing SOD1 mRNA and protein levels following SOD1 knockdown. K, L The effect of concentration dependent SOD1 knockdown on protein levels was determined by Western blot and mRNA expression levels were measured using RT-qPCR. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ns- not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001 as analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test.

    Techniques Used: Nucleic Acid Electrophoresis, Control, In Vitro, Binding Assay, Transfection, Positive Control, Negative Control, Cytometry, Centrifugation, Isolation, Knockdown, Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Two Tailed Test

    Fig. 4 In vitro nanoparticle toxicity. A Schematic diagram of the in vitro induction of acquired platinum resistance. B Baseline cisplatin sensitivity of A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines. C The IC50 of A2780 and A2780DDP were 4.71 ± 0.26 and 13.95 ± 1.18 µg/ml, respectively. D Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA levels (n = 6). E Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines in vivo in Q1 and Q3. F Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA (n = 3). G Schematic illustration of xenograft tumour sample preparation for immunoblotting and qRT-PCR. H Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell-derived xenograft tumour tissue samples. I Cisplatin treatment of A2780DDP cells (n = 6) induced SOD1 mRNA overexpression in a concentration-dependent manner measured by RT-qPCR. J Time-course evaluation SOD1 mRNA induction by GOPEI treatment in A2780DDP cells (n = 6) measured by qRT-PCR. K Cytotoxicity of GO, PEI, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG were determined at the following concentrations: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 µg/mL, respectively. L MTT assay showing relative cell viability after A2780 cells were treated with 9 µg/mL of GOPEI for 48 h followed by cisplatin treatment at 14 different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28 µg/mL respectively). IC50 values were compared with that of A2780 cells (n = 6). M Volcano plot showing the transcriptional activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response by 15 µM cisplatin in A2780 cell line. N, O GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG treatment-induced differential in vitro activation of the UPRmt in (N) A2780 and (O) A2780DDP cell lines. P Schematic diagram illustrating UPRmt activation by cisplatin, graphene and cationic polymers leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent mito-nuclear signalling.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 4 In vitro nanoparticle toxicity. A Schematic diagram of the in vitro induction of acquired platinum resistance. B Baseline cisplatin sensitivity of A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines. C The IC50 of A2780 and A2780DDP were 4.71 ± 0.26 and 13.95 ± 1.18 µg/ml, respectively. D Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA levels (n = 6). E Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines in vivo in Q1 and Q3. F Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA (n = 3). G Schematic illustration of xenograft tumour sample preparation for immunoblotting and qRT-PCR. H Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell-derived xenograft tumour tissue samples. I Cisplatin treatment of A2780DDP cells (n = 6) induced SOD1 mRNA overexpression in a concentration-dependent manner measured by RT-qPCR. J Time-course evaluation SOD1 mRNA induction by GOPEI treatment in A2780DDP cells (n = 6) measured by qRT-PCR. K Cytotoxicity of GO, PEI, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG were determined at the following concentrations: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 µg/mL, respectively. L MTT assay showing relative cell viability after A2780 cells were treated with 9 µg/mL of GOPEI for 48 h followed by cisplatin treatment at 14 different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28 µg/mL respectively). IC50 values were compared with that of A2780 cells (n = 6). M Volcano plot showing the transcriptional activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response by 15 µM cisplatin in A2780 cell line. N, O GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG treatment-induced differential in vitro activation of the UPRmt in (N) A2780 and (O) A2780DDP cell lines. P Schematic diagram illustrating UPRmt activation by cisplatin, graphene and cationic polymers leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent mito-nuclear signalling.

    Techniques Used: In Vitro, Western Blot, In Vivo, Sample Prep, Quantitative RT-PCR, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Concentration Assay, MTT Assay, Activation Assay



    Similar Products

    96
    Proteintech mouse anti human sod1
    Fig. 3 Nanoparticle behaviour in biological solutions. A Colloidal stability of GO, GOPEI, and GOPEI-mPEG were assessed in DIW, 0.9% NaCl, and RPMI + 10% FBS, 1 h after treatment. Nanoparticle aggregation was observed in all three biological solutions containing non- functionalized GO. B, C Gel-electrophoresis-based serum stability was carried out in GOPEI1x, GOPEI2x, and GOPEI3x. The susceptibility of siRNA to RNase degradation in serum was assessed for 48 h. Naked siSCR was used as a control. D Kinetic study of nanocarrier-siRNA serum stability was measured using mouse serum in siSCRFAM conjugated GOPEI, GOPEI-mPEG, and Lipo2000 relative to control naked siSCRFAM. The fluorescence of siSCRFAM was measured over a time of up to 8 h. E Kinetic study of nanoparticle behaviour was conducted in vitro using siSCRFAM complexed GO, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG. The degree of quenching induced by GOPEI upon binding siSCRFAM was measured by a Varioskan fluorescent plate reader. A 10 h time-course study of the live cell uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by recording their fluorescent emission. Samples containing only cells and RPMI media were used as negative controls. F Confocal laser scanning images showing the cellular uptake of GOPEI- siSCRFAM. Merged fluorescence images of cells treated with GOPEI- siSCRFAM with a magnified image of a single A2780 cell showing successful transfection of GOPEI as aggregations were compared with Lipo2000 as the positive control, and naked siSCRFAM was used as a negative control. G Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle: siRNA cellular uptake GOPEI-siRNA transfection efficiency was analyzed using flow cytometry. Two siSCRFAM concentrations of 60 nM and 90 nM complexed with Lipo2000 served as positive control. H Image showing intracellular graphene accumulation in cell pellets following three washing steps and centrifugation prior to protein isolation. I, J Time-course study showing <t>SOD1</t> mRNA and protein levels following SOD1 knockdown. K, L The effect of concentration dependent SOD1 knockdown on protein levels was determined by Western blot and mRNA expression levels were measured using RT-qPCR. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ns- not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001 as analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test.
    Mouse Anti Human Sod1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti human sod1/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti human sod1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MBL Life science mouse monoclonal anti-human sod1
    Fig. 3 Nanoparticle behaviour in biological solutions. A Colloidal stability of GO, GOPEI, and GOPEI-mPEG were assessed in DIW, 0.9% NaCl, and RPMI + 10% FBS, 1 h after treatment. Nanoparticle aggregation was observed in all three biological solutions containing non- functionalized GO. B, C Gel-electrophoresis-based serum stability was carried out in GOPEI1x, GOPEI2x, and GOPEI3x. The susceptibility of siRNA to RNase degradation in serum was assessed for 48 h. Naked siSCR was used as a control. D Kinetic study of nanocarrier-siRNA serum stability was measured using mouse serum in siSCRFAM conjugated GOPEI, GOPEI-mPEG, and Lipo2000 relative to control naked siSCRFAM. The fluorescence of siSCRFAM was measured over a time of up to 8 h. E Kinetic study of nanoparticle behaviour was conducted in vitro using siSCRFAM complexed GO, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG. The degree of quenching induced by GOPEI upon binding siSCRFAM was measured by a Varioskan fluorescent plate reader. A 10 h time-course study of the live cell uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by recording their fluorescent emission. Samples containing only cells and RPMI media were used as negative controls. F Confocal laser scanning images showing the cellular uptake of GOPEI- siSCRFAM. Merged fluorescence images of cells treated with GOPEI- siSCRFAM with a magnified image of a single A2780 cell showing successful transfection of GOPEI as aggregations were compared with Lipo2000 as the positive control, and naked siSCRFAM was used as a negative control. G Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle: siRNA cellular uptake GOPEI-siRNA transfection efficiency was analyzed using flow cytometry. Two siSCRFAM concentrations of 60 nM and 90 nM complexed with Lipo2000 served as positive control. H Image showing intracellular graphene accumulation in cell pellets following three washing steps and centrifugation prior to protein isolation. I, J Time-course study showing <t>SOD1</t> mRNA and protein levels following SOD1 knockdown. K, L The effect of concentration dependent SOD1 knockdown on protein levels was determined by Western blot and mRNA expression levels were measured using RT-qPCR. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ns- not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001 as analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Human Sod1, supplied by MBL Life science, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti-human sod1/product/MBL Life science
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti-human sod1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti human sod1
    The expression of <t>SOD1</t> in glioma tissues. (A) SOD1 IHC scores of normal brain tissues, tumor adjacent tissues and glioma grade I, II, III and IV tissues. * P < 0.05 compared with the normal brain tissue (Nor) or glioma grade I tissues. (B) Staining intensity of glioma with different histopathological types. Staining intensity was scored using a four-tier scale and defined as follows: negative staining (0-80); weak staining (80-200); moderate staining (200-300); strong staining (300-400). Nor, normal brain tissue; Adj, glioma adjacent tissues; I, well differentiated glioma; II, moderately differentiated glioma; III, poorly differentiated glioma; and IV, non-differentiated glioma. (C) SOD1 IHC staining for full glioma microarray. (D-E) Representative SOD1 weak (D) , moderate staining (E) in normal brain tissues. (F-H) Representative SOD1 weak (F) , moderate (G) , strong staining (H) in glioma adjacent tissues. (I-K) Representative SOD1 weak (I) , moderate (J) , strong staining (K) in glioma grade I tissues. (L, M) Representative SOD1 weak (L) , moderate (M) , strong staining (N) in glioma grade II tissues. (O-Q) Representative SOD1 weak (O) , moderate (P) , strong staining (Q) in glioma grade III tissues. (R) Representative SOD1 strong staining in glioma grade IV tissues.
    Mouse Monoclonal Anti Human Sod1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse monoclonal anti human sod1/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse monoclonal anti human sod1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MediMabs Inc mouse anti-human misfolded sod1 clone b8h10
    The expression of <t>SOD1</t> in glioma tissues. (A) SOD1 IHC scores of normal brain tissues, tumor adjacent tissues and glioma grade I, II, III and IV tissues. * P < 0.05 compared with the normal brain tissue (Nor) or glioma grade I tissues. (B) Staining intensity of glioma with different histopathological types. Staining intensity was scored using a four-tier scale and defined as follows: negative staining (0-80); weak staining (80-200); moderate staining (200-300); strong staining (300-400). Nor, normal brain tissue; Adj, glioma adjacent tissues; I, well differentiated glioma; II, moderately differentiated glioma; III, poorly differentiated glioma; and IV, non-differentiated glioma. (C) SOD1 IHC staining for full glioma microarray. (D-E) Representative SOD1 weak (D) , moderate staining (E) in normal brain tissues. (F-H) Representative SOD1 weak (F) , moderate (G) , strong staining (H) in glioma adjacent tissues. (I-K) Representative SOD1 weak (I) , moderate (J) , strong staining (K) in glioma grade I tissues. (L, M) Representative SOD1 weak (L) , moderate (M) , strong staining (N) in glioma grade II tissues. (O-Q) Representative SOD1 weak (O) , moderate (P) , strong staining (Q) in glioma grade III tissues. (R) Representative SOD1 strong staining in glioma grade IV tissues.
    Mouse Anti Human Misfolded Sod1 Clone B8h10, supplied by MediMabs Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-human misfolded sod1 clone b8h10/product/MediMabs Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-human misfolded sod1 clone b8h10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MediMabs Inc mouse anti-human misfolded sod1 b8h10
    The expression of <t>SOD1</t> in glioma tissues. (A) SOD1 IHC scores of normal brain tissues, tumor adjacent tissues and glioma grade I, II, III and IV tissues. * P < 0.05 compared with the normal brain tissue (Nor) or glioma grade I tissues. (B) Staining intensity of glioma with different histopathological types. Staining intensity was scored using a four-tier scale and defined as follows: negative staining (0-80); weak staining (80-200); moderate staining (200-300); strong staining (300-400). Nor, normal brain tissue; Adj, glioma adjacent tissues; I, well differentiated glioma; II, moderately differentiated glioma; III, poorly differentiated glioma; and IV, non-differentiated glioma. (C) SOD1 IHC staining for full glioma microarray. (D-E) Representative SOD1 weak (D) , moderate staining (E) in normal brain tissues. (F-H) Representative SOD1 weak (F) , moderate (G) , strong staining (H) in glioma adjacent tissues. (I-K) Representative SOD1 weak (I) , moderate (J) , strong staining (K) in glioma grade I tissues. (L, M) Representative SOD1 weak (L) , moderate (M) , strong staining (N) in glioma grade II tissues. (O-Q) Representative SOD1 weak (O) , moderate (P) , strong staining (Q) in glioma grade III tissues. (R) Representative SOD1 strong staining in glioma grade IV tissues.
    Mouse Anti Human Misfolded Sod1 B8h10, supplied by MediMabs Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-human misfolded sod1 b8h10/product/MediMabs Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-human misfolded sod1 b8h10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MediMabs Inc anti-misfolded human sod1 mouse monoclonal
    Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry
    Anti Misfolded Human Sod1 Mouse Monoclonal, supplied by MediMabs Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-misfolded human sod1 mouse monoclonal/product/MediMabs Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-misfolded human sod1 mouse monoclonal - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Novus Biologicals mouse anti-human sod1 antibody nbp1-47443
    Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry
    Mouse Anti Human Sod1 Antibody Nbp1 47443, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti-human sod1 antibody nbp1-47443/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti-human sod1 antibody nbp1-47443 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Fig. 3 Nanoparticle behaviour in biological solutions. A Colloidal stability of GO, GOPEI, and GOPEI-mPEG were assessed in DIW, 0.9% NaCl, and RPMI + 10% FBS, 1 h after treatment. Nanoparticle aggregation was observed in all three biological solutions containing non- functionalized GO. B, C Gel-electrophoresis-based serum stability was carried out in GOPEI1x, GOPEI2x, and GOPEI3x. The susceptibility of siRNA to RNase degradation in serum was assessed for 48 h. Naked siSCR was used as a control. D Kinetic study of nanocarrier-siRNA serum stability was measured using mouse serum in siSCRFAM conjugated GOPEI, GOPEI-mPEG, and Lipo2000 relative to control naked siSCRFAM. The fluorescence of siSCRFAM was measured over a time of up to 8 h. E Kinetic study of nanoparticle behaviour was conducted in vitro using siSCRFAM complexed GO, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG. The degree of quenching induced by GOPEI upon binding siSCRFAM was measured by a Varioskan fluorescent plate reader. A 10 h time-course study of the live cell uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by recording their fluorescent emission. Samples containing only cells and RPMI media were used as negative controls. F Confocal laser scanning images showing the cellular uptake of GOPEI- siSCRFAM. Merged fluorescence images of cells treated with GOPEI- siSCRFAM with a magnified image of a single A2780 cell showing successful transfection of GOPEI as aggregations were compared with Lipo2000 as the positive control, and naked siSCRFAM was used as a negative control. G Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle: siRNA cellular uptake GOPEI-siRNA transfection efficiency was analyzed using flow cytometry. Two siSCRFAM concentrations of 60 nM and 90 nM complexed with Lipo2000 served as positive control. H Image showing intracellular graphene accumulation in cell pellets following three washing steps and centrifugation prior to protein isolation. I, J Time-course study showing SOD1 mRNA and protein levels following SOD1 knockdown. K, L The effect of concentration dependent SOD1 knockdown on protein levels was determined by Western blot and mRNA expression levels were measured using RT-qPCR. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ns- not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001 as analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test.

    Journal: Cancer gene therapy

    Article Title: Targeting SOD1 via RNAi with PEGylated graphene oxide nanoparticles in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

    doi: 10.1038/s41417-023-00659-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3 Nanoparticle behaviour in biological solutions. A Colloidal stability of GO, GOPEI, and GOPEI-mPEG were assessed in DIW, 0.9% NaCl, and RPMI + 10% FBS, 1 h after treatment. Nanoparticle aggregation was observed in all three biological solutions containing non- functionalized GO. B, C Gel-electrophoresis-based serum stability was carried out in GOPEI1x, GOPEI2x, and GOPEI3x. The susceptibility of siRNA to RNase degradation in serum was assessed for 48 h. Naked siSCR was used as a control. D Kinetic study of nanocarrier-siRNA serum stability was measured using mouse serum in siSCRFAM conjugated GOPEI, GOPEI-mPEG, and Lipo2000 relative to control naked siSCRFAM. The fluorescence of siSCRFAM was measured over a time of up to 8 h. E Kinetic study of nanoparticle behaviour was conducted in vitro using siSCRFAM complexed GO, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG. The degree of quenching induced by GOPEI upon binding siSCRFAM was measured by a Varioskan fluorescent plate reader. A 10 h time-course study of the live cell uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by recording their fluorescent emission. Samples containing only cells and RPMI media were used as negative controls. F Confocal laser scanning images showing the cellular uptake of GOPEI- siSCRFAM. Merged fluorescence images of cells treated with GOPEI- siSCRFAM with a magnified image of a single A2780 cell showing successful transfection of GOPEI as aggregations were compared with Lipo2000 as the positive control, and naked siSCRFAM was used as a negative control. G Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle: siRNA cellular uptake GOPEI-siRNA transfection efficiency was analyzed using flow cytometry. Two siSCRFAM concentrations of 60 nM and 90 nM complexed with Lipo2000 served as positive control. H Image showing intracellular graphene accumulation in cell pellets following three washing steps and centrifugation prior to protein isolation. I, J Time-course study showing SOD1 mRNA and protein levels following SOD1 knockdown. K, L The effect of concentration dependent SOD1 knockdown on protein levels was determined by Western blot and mRNA expression levels were measured using RT-qPCR. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ns- not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001 as analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test.

    Article Snippet: The membrane was incubated with mouse anti-human SOD1 (15.9 kDa) monoclonal antibody (Cat# 67480-1-Ig, 1:1000, ProteinTech, Rosemont, IL, USA) and with mouse β-actin (42 kDa) monoclonal antibody (1:2000, Cat# 66009-1-Ig, ProteinTech) overnight at 40 °C.

    Techniques: Nucleic Acid Electrophoresis, Control, In Vitro, Binding Assay, Transfection, Positive Control, Negative Control, Cytometry, Centrifugation, Isolation, Knockdown, Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Two Tailed Test

    Fig. 4 In vitro nanoparticle toxicity. A Schematic diagram of the in vitro induction of acquired platinum resistance. B Baseline cisplatin sensitivity of A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines. C The IC50 of A2780 and A2780DDP were 4.71 ± 0.26 and 13.95 ± 1.18 µg/ml, respectively. D Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA levels (n = 6). E Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines in vivo in Q1 and Q3. F Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA (n = 3). G Schematic illustration of xenograft tumour sample preparation for immunoblotting and qRT-PCR. H Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell-derived xenograft tumour tissue samples. I Cisplatin treatment of A2780DDP cells (n = 6) induced SOD1 mRNA overexpression in a concentration-dependent manner measured by RT-qPCR. J Time-course evaluation SOD1 mRNA induction by GOPEI treatment in A2780DDP cells (n = 6) measured by qRT-PCR. K Cytotoxicity of GO, PEI, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG were determined at the following concentrations: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 µg/mL, respectively. L MTT assay showing relative cell viability after A2780 cells were treated with 9 µg/mL of GOPEI for 48 h followed by cisplatin treatment at 14 different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28 µg/mL respectively). IC50 values were compared with that of A2780 cells (n = 6). M Volcano plot showing the transcriptional activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response by 15 µM cisplatin in A2780 cell line. N, O GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG treatment-induced differential in vitro activation of the UPRmt in (N) A2780 and (O) A2780DDP cell lines. P Schematic diagram illustrating UPRmt activation by cisplatin, graphene and cationic polymers leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent mito-nuclear signalling.

    Journal: Cancer gene therapy

    Article Title: Targeting SOD1 via RNAi with PEGylated graphene oxide nanoparticles in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

    doi: 10.1038/s41417-023-00659-2

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4 In vitro nanoparticle toxicity. A Schematic diagram of the in vitro induction of acquired platinum resistance. B Baseline cisplatin sensitivity of A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines. C The IC50 of A2780 and A2780DDP were 4.71 ± 0.26 and 13.95 ± 1.18 µg/ml, respectively. D Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA levels (n = 6). E Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines in vivo in Q1 and Q3. F Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA (n = 3). G Schematic illustration of xenograft tumour sample preparation for immunoblotting and qRT-PCR. H Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell-derived xenograft tumour tissue samples. I Cisplatin treatment of A2780DDP cells (n = 6) induced SOD1 mRNA overexpression in a concentration-dependent manner measured by RT-qPCR. J Time-course evaluation SOD1 mRNA induction by GOPEI treatment in A2780DDP cells (n = 6) measured by qRT-PCR. K Cytotoxicity of GO, PEI, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG were determined at the following concentrations: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 µg/mL, respectively. L MTT assay showing relative cell viability after A2780 cells were treated with 9 µg/mL of GOPEI for 48 h followed by cisplatin treatment at 14 different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28 µg/mL respectively). IC50 values were compared with that of A2780 cells (n = 6). M Volcano plot showing the transcriptional activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response by 15 µM cisplatin in A2780 cell line. N, O GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG treatment-induced differential in vitro activation of the UPRmt in (N) A2780 and (O) A2780DDP cell lines. P Schematic diagram illustrating UPRmt activation by cisplatin, graphene and cationic polymers leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent mito-nuclear signalling.

    Article Snippet: The membrane was incubated with mouse anti-human SOD1 (15.9 kDa) monoclonal antibody (Cat# 67480-1-Ig, 1:1000, ProteinTech, Rosemont, IL, USA) and with mouse β-actin (42 kDa) monoclonal antibody (1:2000, Cat# 66009-1-Ig, ProteinTech) overnight at 40 °C.

    Techniques: In Vitro, Western Blot, In Vivo, Sample Prep, Quantitative RT-PCR, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Concentration Assay, MTT Assay, Activation Assay

    The expression of SOD1 in glioma tissues. (A) SOD1 IHC scores of normal brain tissues, tumor adjacent tissues and glioma grade I, II, III and IV tissues. * P < 0.05 compared with the normal brain tissue (Nor) or glioma grade I tissues. (B) Staining intensity of glioma with different histopathological types. Staining intensity was scored using a four-tier scale and defined as follows: negative staining (0-80); weak staining (80-200); moderate staining (200-300); strong staining (300-400). Nor, normal brain tissue; Adj, glioma adjacent tissues; I, well differentiated glioma; II, moderately differentiated glioma; III, poorly differentiated glioma; and IV, non-differentiated glioma. (C) SOD1 IHC staining for full glioma microarray. (D-E) Representative SOD1 weak (D) , moderate staining (E) in normal brain tissues. (F-H) Representative SOD1 weak (F) , moderate (G) , strong staining (H) in glioma adjacent tissues. (I-K) Representative SOD1 weak (I) , moderate (J) , strong staining (K) in glioma grade I tissues. (L, M) Representative SOD1 weak (L) , moderate (M) , strong staining (N) in glioma grade II tissues. (O-Q) Representative SOD1 weak (O) , moderate (P) , strong staining (Q) in glioma grade III tissues. (R) Representative SOD1 strong staining in glioma grade IV tissues.

    Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

    Article Title: LCS-1 inhibition of superoxide dismutase 1 induces ROS-dependent death of glioma cells and degradates PARP and BRCA1

    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937444

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of SOD1 in glioma tissues. (A) SOD1 IHC scores of normal brain tissues, tumor adjacent tissues and glioma grade I, II, III and IV tissues. * P < 0.05 compared with the normal brain tissue (Nor) or glioma grade I tissues. (B) Staining intensity of glioma with different histopathological types. Staining intensity was scored using a four-tier scale and defined as follows: negative staining (0-80); weak staining (80-200); moderate staining (200-300); strong staining (300-400). Nor, normal brain tissue; Adj, glioma adjacent tissues; I, well differentiated glioma; II, moderately differentiated glioma; III, poorly differentiated glioma; and IV, non-differentiated glioma. (C) SOD1 IHC staining for full glioma microarray. (D-E) Representative SOD1 weak (D) , moderate staining (E) in normal brain tissues. (F-H) Representative SOD1 weak (F) , moderate (G) , strong staining (H) in glioma adjacent tissues. (I-K) Representative SOD1 weak (I) , moderate (J) , strong staining (K) in glioma grade I tissues. (L, M) Representative SOD1 weak (L) , moderate (M) , strong staining (N) in glioma grade II tissues. (O-Q) Representative SOD1 weak (O) , moderate (P) , strong staining (Q) in glioma grade III tissues. (R) Representative SOD1 strong staining in glioma grade IV tissues.

    Article Snippet: Mouse monoclonal anti-human SOD1 (sc-101523), SOD2 (sc-137254), BRCA1 (sc-6954) and BRCA2 (sc-518154) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Staining, Negative Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Microarray

    The expression of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 in glioma cell lines. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 mRNA levels in U251 cells. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 mRNA levels in U87 cells. (C) FACS analysis of SOD1 and SOD2 protein levels in U251 and U87 cells. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of SOD1 and 2 mRNA levels in U251 cells treated with 10 µM LCS-1 for the indicated time periods. * P < 0.05 compared with the medium groups. (E) qRT-PCR analysis of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 mRNA levels in U87 cells treated with 10 µM LCS-1 for the indicated time periods. * P < 0.05 compared with the medium groups. (F, G) Western blot analysis of the protein levels of SOD1 in U251 (F) and U87 (G) cells. (H, I) The quantitative data from F (H) and G (I) respectively. * P < 0.05 compared with the medium groups.

    Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

    Article Title: LCS-1 inhibition of superoxide dismutase 1 induces ROS-dependent death of glioma cells and degradates PARP and BRCA1

    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937444

    Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 in glioma cell lines. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 mRNA levels in U251 cells. (B) qRT-PCR analysis of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 mRNA levels in U87 cells. (C) FACS analysis of SOD1 and SOD2 protein levels in U251 and U87 cells. (D) qRT-PCR analysis of SOD1 and 2 mRNA levels in U251 cells treated with 10 µM LCS-1 for the indicated time periods. * P < 0.05 compared with the medium groups. (E) qRT-PCR analysis of SOD1, SOD2 and SOD3 mRNA levels in U87 cells treated with 10 µM LCS-1 for the indicated time periods. * P < 0.05 compared with the medium groups. (F, G) Western blot analysis of the protein levels of SOD1 in U251 (F) and U87 (G) cells. (H, I) The quantitative data from F (H) and G (I) respectively. * P < 0.05 compared with the medium groups.

    Article Snippet: Mouse monoclonal anti-human SOD1 (sc-101523), SOD2 (sc-137254), BRCA1 (sc-6954) and BRCA2 (sc-518154) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot

    Model of the mechanism by which LCS-1 induces cell death. LCS-1 inhibited the enzyme activity of SOD1, resulting in the accumulation of ROS, leading to the induction of DNA damage. Meanwhile, LCS-1 induces the degradation of PARP. The dysfunction of PARP inhibits DNA damage repair via blocking both PARylation-mediated and EJ-mediated pathways. Furthermore, LCS-1 induces the degradation of BRCA1, eliciting the block of HR-mediated pathway. The inhibition of these three repair pathways results in death of glioma cells.

    Journal: Frontiers in Oncology

    Article Title: LCS-1 inhibition of superoxide dismutase 1 induces ROS-dependent death of glioma cells and degradates PARP and BRCA1

    doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937444

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Model of the mechanism by which LCS-1 induces cell death. LCS-1 inhibited the enzyme activity of SOD1, resulting in the accumulation of ROS, leading to the induction of DNA damage. Meanwhile, LCS-1 induces the degradation of PARP. The dysfunction of PARP inhibits DNA damage repair via blocking both PARylation-mediated and EJ-mediated pathways. Furthermore, LCS-1 induces the degradation of BRCA1, eliciting the block of HR-mediated pathway. The inhibition of these three repair pathways results in death of glioma cells.

    Article Snippet: Mouse monoclonal anti-human SOD1 (sc-101523), SOD2 (sc-137254), BRCA1 (sc-6954) and BRCA2 (sc-518154) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Blocking Assay, Inhibition

    Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry

    Journal: Brain Pathology

    Article Title: Accumulation of misfolded SOD1 outlines distinct patterns of motor neuron pathology and death during disease progression in a SOD1 G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    doi: 10.1111/bpa.13078

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry

    Article Snippet: SOD1 (C4F6) Anti‐Misfolded Human SOD1 , Mouse monoclonal , MediMabs 2B Scientific (MM‐00070‐2‐P) , 1:100.

    Techniques: Ubiquitin Proteomics