mouse anti human sod1 (Proteintech)
Structured Review

Mouse Anti Human Sod1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 401 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti human sod1/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 401 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Targeting SOD1 via RNAi with PEGylated graphene oxide nanoparticles in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer."
Article Title: Targeting SOD1 via RNAi with PEGylated graphene oxide nanoparticles in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Journal: Cancer gene therapy
doi: 10.1038/s41417-023-00659-2
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 3 Nanoparticle behaviour in biological solutions. A Colloidal stability of GO, GOPEI, and GOPEI-mPEG were assessed in DIW, 0.9% NaCl, and RPMI + 10% FBS, 1 h after treatment. Nanoparticle aggregation was observed in all three biological solutions containing non- functionalized GO. B, C Gel-electrophoresis-based serum stability was carried out in GOPEI1x, GOPEI2x, and GOPEI3x. The susceptibility of siRNA to RNase degradation in serum was assessed for 48 h. Naked siSCR was used as a control. D Kinetic study of nanocarrier-siRNA serum stability was measured using mouse serum in siSCRFAM conjugated GOPEI, GOPEI-mPEG, and Lipo2000 relative to control naked siSCRFAM. The fluorescence of siSCRFAM was measured over a time of up to 8 h. E Kinetic study of nanoparticle behaviour was conducted in vitro using siSCRFAM complexed GO, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG. The degree of quenching induced by GOPEI upon binding siSCRFAM was measured by a Varioskan fluorescent plate reader. A 10 h time-course study of the live cell uptake of the nanoparticles was measured by recording their fluorescent emission. Samples containing only cells and RPMI media were used as negative controls. F Confocal laser scanning images showing the cellular uptake of GOPEI- siSCRFAM. Merged fluorescence images of cells treated with GOPEI- siSCRFAM with a magnified image of a single A2780 cell showing successful transfection of GOPEI as aggregations were compared with Lipo2000 as the positive control, and naked siSCRFAM was used as a negative control. G Quantitative assessment of nanoparticle: siRNA cellular uptake GOPEI-siRNA transfection efficiency was analyzed using flow cytometry. Two siSCRFAM concentrations of 60 nM and 90 nM complexed with Lipo2000 served as positive control. H Image showing intracellular graphene accumulation in cell pellets following three washing steps and centrifugation prior to protein isolation. I, J Time-course study showing SOD1 mRNA and protein levels following SOD1 knockdown. K, L The effect of concentration dependent SOD1 knockdown on protein levels was determined by Western blot and mRNA expression levels were measured using RT-qPCR. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. ns- not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001 as analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test.
Techniques Used: Nucleic Acid Electrophoresis, Control, In Vitro, Binding Assay, Transfection, Positive Control, Negative Control, Cytometry, Centrifugation, Isolation, Knockdown, Concentration Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 4 In vitro nanoparticle toxicity. A Schematic diagram of the in vitro induction of acquired platinum resistance. B Baseline cisplatin sensitivity of A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines. C The IC50 of A2780 and A2780DDP were 4.71 ± 0.26 and 13.95 ± 1.18 µg/ml, respectively. D Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA levels (n = 6). E Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell lines in vivo in Q1 and Q3. F Bar graph showing normalized baseline SOD1 mRNA (n = 3). G Schematic illustration of xenograft tumour sample preparation for immunoblotting and qRT-PCR. H Western blot showing the SOD1 protein levels in A2780 and A2780DDP cell-derived xenograft tumour tissue samples. I Cisplatin treatment of A2780DDP cells (n = 6) induced SOD1 mRNA overexpression in a concentration-dependent manner measured by RT-qPCR. J Time-course evaluation SOD1 mRNA induction by GOPEI treatment in A2780DDP cells (n = 6) measured by qRT-PCR. K Cytotoxicity of GO, PEI, GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG were determined at the following concentrations: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 µg/mL, respectively. L MTT assay showing relative cell viability after A2780 cells were treated with 9 µg/mL of GOPEI for 48 h followed by cisplatin treatment at 14 different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26 and 28 µg/mL respectively). IC50 values were compared with that of A2780 cells (n = 6). M Volcano plot showing the transcriptional activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response by 15 µM cisplatin in A2780 cell line. N, O GOPEI and GOPEI-mPEG treatment-induced differential in vitro activation of the UPRmt in (N) A2780 and (O) A2780DDP cell lines. P Schematic diagram illustrating UPRmt activation by cisplatin, graphene and cationic polymers leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and subsequent mito-nuclear signalling.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Western Blot, In Vivo, Sample Prep, Quantitative RT-PCR, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Concentration Assay, MTT Assay, Activation Assay

